Showing posts with label research. Show all posts
Showing posts with label research. Show all posts

Sunday, August 05, 2012

SIGIR - Casualties in Iraq

Via David Isenberg, a new report from the SIGIR.

Special Report Number 2:
The Human Toll of Reconstruction or Stabilization during Operation Iraqi Freedom PDF
Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (SIGIR)
July 27, 2012

Excerpt from page 5

We accounted for at least 198 people kidnapped while working on U.S.-supervised
reconstruction or stabilization projects. USACE reported at least 148 Iraqis kidnapped while working on USACE reconstruction projects from May 2006-December 2007. USAID reports identified 42 Iraqis as well as 8 third-country nationals kidnapped while working on USAID projects from 2004-2010. We do not know how many of these kidnap victims were taken simply because of their involvement with U.S. reconstruction efforts or how many were later freed.
The math above: 198 people kidnapped - 148 Iraqis - 42 Iraqis - 8 TCN =  0 kidnapped Americans

The table of Americans Missing in Iraq lists at minimum 46 abductions in Iraq between 2003 - 2012. Certainly not all of those were related to reconstruction. But to imply there were none - zip - is just ludicrous.

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

US Army FOIA Reading Room

Poking around the the US Army FOIA Electronic Reading Room. Great resource for researchers provided information has been released by FOIA.

US Army FOIA Electronic Reading Room

Among available documents is the Army Regulation AR-15-6 Informal Investigation Report for the abduction of two troops in Iraq. An AR-15-6 is a fact-finding investigation first undertaken when someone is reported missing. At least, that's the way it is supposed to work.

Memorandum for Record pertaining to Army Regulation 15-6 Investigation regarding PFC Thomas L. Tucker and PFC Kristian Menchaca June 18, 2006

Investigation into the 16195JUN06 attach on B/1-502 IN/2-101 AA, resulting in the death of one Soldier and duty status whereabouts unknown (DUSTWUN) of PFC Thomas L. Tucker and PFC Kristian Menchaca
I wonder if it is possible to file an FOIA for the AR-15-6 for each and every American who has gone missing in Iraq.

Related Reading

Memorandum - Subject: Army Directive 2010-02
(Guidance for Reporting Requirements and Redacting Investigation Reports of Deaths and Fatalities)
John McHugh, Secretary of the Army, March 26, 2010

DD Form 2812
Commander's Preliminary Assessment and Recommendation Regarding Missing Person
November 1999

Sunday, March 04, 2012

NCTC missing 2010 Kidnapping

One of my ongoing projects is trying to find as much information as possible for the status table of Americans Missing in Iraq.


Every so often, I have to check in with the annual Department of State Country Reports on Terrorism. The National Counterterrorism Center typically provides statistical data for the annual reports beginning more or less with 2005. The data for 2008 is (sort of) missing and the link for 2004 is bad. Still, it's a good starting place, for comparing reported kidnappings between the Country Reports and the leaked SIGACT reports.
U.S. Department of State
Country Reports on Terrorism
The most recent Country Reports on Terrorism for 2010 from the Department of State were issued on August 18, 2011.
Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, Kidnappings of Private U.S. Citizens, 2010
Country Reports on Terrorism 2010
US Department of State
August 18, 2011
The report shows no known kidnappings in 2010 - which is surprising because an Iraqi American contractor, Issa T. Salomi, of El Cajon, California was kidnapped by Asaib Ahl al-Haq, an Iranian backed insurgent group in Baghdad on January 23, 2010. Salomi was released in exchange for four militants in Iraqi detention on March 25, 2010.

Salomi was reported to be an 'Army civilian employee' by the Department of Defense. In theory, that should make him eligible for inclusion in the data, unless Asaib Ahl al-Haq is not classified as a Terrorist organization. Which I would have thought they were given that they kidnap people and then make political demands. I must be missing something here.

That's not the only oddity in all of this - in an article about Salomi's kidnapping, Officials confirm kidnapping of U.S. contractor in Iraq, authors Ernesto Londoño and Leila Fadel wrote:
The abduction of contractor Issa T. Salomi, 60, of El Cajon, Calif., marks the first reported kidnapping of an American in Iraq since the summer of 2008. [emphasis mine]
But as of yet, I have not found one single reported kidnapping of an American in Iraq in 2008, anywhere.


Country Reports on Terrorism for 2008 is missing the data page for Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, Kidnappings of Private US Citizens. A pie chart in the 2008 Report on Terrorism at the National Counterterrorism Center shows only 4 kidnappings for that year - 3 in Afghanistan and 1 in Panama.

I like my data neat, clean, and tidy. And here I have 2 years of Kidnapping Reports from the National Counterterrorism Center that both fail and 1 more a little suspect.

It's little details like this that make me worry I've stumbled on some sort of Cuckoo's Egg. If you don't know the story, it's the discovery of a real life hacker who was selling nuclear secrets to the KGB. He was eventually caught, and all because of a 75 cent accounting error.

Tidy data does matter.

By Leila Fadel, Washington Post, March 28, 2010

Officials confirm kidnapping of U.S. contractor in Iraq
By Ernesto Londoño and Leila Fadel, Washington Post, February 6, 2010

Tuesday, March 01, 2011

Hostage Negotiation

With pirates in the news almost daily, now seemed like a good time for this post.

To date, my research has concentrated quite narrowly on American missing persons in Iraq.

And for some time now, I've been collecting the names of companies and individuals involved in risk management, with an emphasis on hostage negotiation or incident response. I first became aware of the work in this area from news reports, trade magazine interviews, etc. Some of the individuals listed below worked with the Hostage Working Group at the US Embassy in Iraq.

I thought this information might be useful to post. I make no warranty as to the quality and effectiveness of the different individuals, groups and/or organizations. I honestly don't know anything about any of them other than what I've read in the news, so anyone using this list will need to do their own due diligence. It's a very safe assumption these services don't come cheap, and that this list is by no means definitive - many more companies are out there.

Government Agencies

FBI
Critical Incident Response Group
Hostage Rescue Team
http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cirg/cirg/

Joint Personnel Recovery Agency
under Joint Forces Command
http://www.jpra.jfcom.mil/site_public/about/about.htm
US Forces-Iraq Personnel Recovery Division
(part of CENTCOM)
Lt. Col. Kevin Dennehy - Director
Lt. Col. Patrick Wright - former Director
Al Faw Palace at Camp Victory
Baghdad, Iraq

Of note: A sole source contract was issued by USF-IPRD for 'support services' to Blackbird Technologies. Blackbird Technologies includes a job opening for Personnel Recovery Mission Specialist under current 'career' listings.

Blackbird Technologies Inc
13900 Lincoln Park Drive
Suite 400
Herndon, VA 20171
703-796-1420
Fax: 703-464-9381
http://blackbirdtech.com/

U.S. Department of State
Hostage Working Group
U.S. Embassy Baghdad
Tel: 1-240-553-0584, ext. 5340 or 5635
Iraqna: 07901-732-134
GSM: 914-822-5493
usconsulbaghdad@state.gov
http://iraq.usembassy.gov
International Zone/Police Emergency Numbers:
Regional Security Office Tactical Operations Center: (914) 360-5828
FBI Tactical Operations Center: (703) 630-0996 ex 20501
Coalition Force Joint Area Support Group (JASG) Security: (914) 822-7775
Consular Affairs Emergency Duty Officer: (914) 360-6753

Erik Rye is the former director of the Hostage Working Group at the United States Embassy in Baghdad. He is currently an employee with the US State Department Operations Directorate, Office of the Coordinator for Counter terrorism.

US State Department Operations Directorate
Office of the Coordinator for Counter terrorism.
Erik Donald Rye - interagency coordinator of international hostage crises
S/CT 2509 HST
Phone: (202) 776-8396
http://www.state.gov/s/ct/about/org/c16675.htm
Office of the Coordinator for Counterterrorism
http://www.state.gov/s/ct/
More information about Erik Rye at the State Department blog:
http://blogs.state.gov/index.php/entries/counterterrorism_recovery/

Private Companies and Consultants

List of Security Companies operating in Iraq
Includes brief descriptions of company services
http://iraq.usembassy.gov/iraq/security_companies.html

Altegrity Risk International (ARI) is the parent company of Kroll and USIS. Former NYC and LAPD Police Chief William Bratton was the Chairman of ARI before becoming the Chairman of Kroll in 2010.

Altegrity Risk International
Corporate Headquarters
570 Lexington Avenue
7th Floor New York, NY 10022
877-230-9082
703-860-0190
http://www.altegrityrisk.com/

Mark Harris leads the incident response team for ASI Global, LLC. ASI is the hostage negotiator for personnel insured by Travelers Group. According to their website, they also provide Kidnap & Ransom services for uninsured parties.

Mark Harris
ASI Global, LLC
2925 Briarpark Dr. Suite 1100
Houston, TX 77042 USA
713-430-7300 phone
713-430-7318 fax
+44 (0) 207 240 3237 outside of the US
responders@asiglobalresponse.com
http://www.asiglobalresponse.com

Christopher Voss was a member of the FBI in the US for 24 years and was the FBI's lead international kidnapping negotiator and is in private practice.

Christopher Voss
Black Swan Group
1000 Water Street SW
Washington, DC 20024
http://blackswanltd.com
chris@blackswanltd.com
917-374-2119 cell phone
202-621-7262 office

See 2012 comment below about AIG canceling its contract with Clayton - Acquired in 2007, Clayton Consultants is now a subsidiary of Triple Canopy. Triple Canopy is a private security company operating in Iraq. Clayton Consultants is the hostage negotiator for personnel insured by AIG. The former head of crisis response, Francisco Quinones, is said to have left Clayton Consultants.

Armand Gadoury - owner
Clayton Consultants - a subsidiary of Triple Canopy
12018 Sunrise Valley Drive
Reston, Virginia 20191 USA
703-673-5581 main
703-673-5001 fax
http://www.claytonconsultants.com/

'Control Risks is retained exclusively by Hiscox at Lloyds of London to provide priority crisis response to clients insured under kidnap-for-ransom and extortion policies.' [ref] Side note: Guillaume Bonnissent is the Kidnap and Ransom insurance underwriter at Hiscox.

Control Risks
Cottons Centre
Cottons Lane
London SE1 2QG
United Kingdom
Tel: + 44 20 7970 2100
Fax: + 44 20 7970 2222
crlondon@control-risks.com
http://www.controlrisks.com/

Dan O'Shea is the former head of the Hostage Working Group in Iraq at the US Embassy in Baghdad and is in private practice.

Daniel O'Shea
Daniel Risk Mitigation, Inc.
3212 W Santiago Street # A
Tampa, FL USA
http://www.danielrisk.com/About.shtml
info@danielrisk.com
813-835-1847 - (phone number may be incorrect)

Donald Palmer is a hostage negotiator who previously worked in military intelligence in Northern Ireland. He is now in private practice. G4S plc was formed in 2004 from the merger of Securicor plc and Group 4 Falck A/S’s security business.

Donald Palmer
Head of Crisis Response
G4S Security Group
The Manor
Manor Royal
Crawley
West Sussex RH10 9UN
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 20 8770 7000
+44 (0) 20 8722 2000
http://www.g4s.com/

According to a comment below, as of 2012, NYA now holds the AIG contract for crisis response.

NYA International
1 Cornhill
London EC3V 3ND
United Kingdom
+44 (0) 203 170 8661
http://www.nyainternational.com/

Garry Vardon-Smith is a former police adviser to the British Embassy in Baghdad and is in private practice.

Garry Vardon-Smith
Risk Reduction Strategies Ltd
27-28 Monmouth Street
Bath BA1 2AP UK
Tel: 01225 840434 - Fax:0870 7051220
http://riskreductionbcm.com/about.htm
info@riskreductionbcm.com
Company Registration Number: 5297384
Additional phone numbers: 960 360 6319 and 07901933352 - (phone numbers may be incorrect)

Bob Parr was the risk management adviser in 2006 to the documentary "Kidnap & Rescue: The Roy Hallums Story" This documentary was the first public look inside of the Hostage Working Group. I am listing him here as a potential source for additional information on the world of hostage negotiators.

Bob Parr
Global Film Solutions
PO Box 2240
Queenstown 9197
New Zealand
+64 3 442 1730 phone
+64 3 442 0730 fax
admin@globalfilmsolutions.com
http://globalfilmsolutions.com

Compass Risk Management - security company
telephone: +44 (0) 1476 550 166
mobile: +44 (0) 7946 053 797
info@compass-rm.com/
http://www.compass-rm.com/

Kidnap Prevention Programs

Course: Surviving Hostile Regions
AKE Group
Saint Owen's Chambers - Corporate Headquarters
22 St. Owen Street
Hereford
HR1 2PL
UNITED KINGDOM
Tel: +44 (0)1432 267111
Fax: +44 (0)1432 350227
services@akegroup.com
http://www.akegroup.com/

Training Services by subject
Asset Protection Network - trade group
http://www.aprodex.com/training-services-54-c.aspx

Course Listings by date and location
ASIS International - trade group
Worldwide Headquarters USA
1625 Prince Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314-2818
Member Services: asis@asisonline.org
+1.703.519.6200
fax +1.703.519.6299
http://www.asisonline.org/

Training: High Risk Travel Seminar
National Hostage Survival Training Center
subsidiary Center for Personal Protection & Recovery
N. 108 Washington
Suite 600
Spokane, WA 99201
509-468-4128 phone
509-468-1225 fax
http://www.cppssite.com/

References

As kidnappings for ransom surge in Mexico, victims' families and employers turn to private U.S. firms instead of law enforcement
By Nick Miroff Washington Post, February 26, 2011

Tales of the hostage negotiators
By James Boxell, January 21, 2010

The business of kidnapping
By Joe Kelly, The Australian, February 17, 2010

Living the Baghdad Experience
Keeping Terrorism at Bay, Talk Through, April/May 2005, p14
Magazine of the Ministry of Defence Police, Printed in the UK by Holbrooks Printers Ltd.

Friday, February 25, 2011

DBA Summary Reports at the Dept of Labor

New feature over at the Department of Labor - Defense Base Act Summary Reports. And for unknown reasons, Ultra Services is not listed, neither for the disappearance of Kirk von Ackermann nor the drive-by shooting deaths of Ryan Manelick nor his Iraqi driver. Three distinct casualties just don't exist in the Department of Labor records.

Department of Labor
Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Defense Base Act Summary Reports
DBA Reports by Employer
September 1, 2001 through December 31, 2010
Easy to assume it was a simple bureaucratic oversight. But here's the really strange part. A similar summary report was circulating among those who follow overseas contracting issues a few years back. And at that time, Ultra Services was included. Why did the Department of Labor decide to exclude Ultra Services?

Are any other casualties missing?

Defense Base Act/War Hazards Act Summary by Employer for Iraq
Department of Labor
As of 08/08/2006, page 7

Page 7
I first came across the 2006 Summary Report at the website for American Contractors in Iraq:
http://americancontractorsiniraq.com/files/contractor-deaths1.pdf

Tuesday, February 22, 2011

Reading Room

What follows is a list of publicly available manuals, instructions, regulations, laws and policies applicable to overseas Americans who go missing while working under contract for US government agencies. If links go bad, use a search engine like google to find updated information about the publication you seek.

Legal Reference Material

The laws that govern missing persons, hostage affairs, etc.

National Security Act of 1947 
Establishes intelligence community support for missing persons. See Section 117 POW/MIA Analytic Capability. Also see 50 USC § 404L: United States Code, Title 50 - War and National Defense, Chapter 15 - National Security, Subchapter I - Coordination for National Security, 404L - POW Analytic Capability. The National Security Act of 1947 was last amended in 2007 by Public Law 110-53.

U.S. Code Title 10 § 1513
Legal definition of a missing person. United States Code, Title 10 - Armed Forces, Subtitle A - General Military Law, Part II - Personnel, Chapter 76 - Missing Persons.

Missing Persons Act
10 USC § 1501 - 1513 (A) policy, control, and oversight within the Department of Defense of the entire process for investigation and recovery related to missing persons (including matters related to search, rescue, escape, and evasion); and (B) coordination for the Department of Defense with other departments and agencies of the United States on all matters concerning missing persons.

Presumed Death under the Missing Persons Act
States laws govern how presumption of death is determined for a missing person. This is a critical phase in getting benefits in a prompt manner to surviving family members. Sample law for Rhode Island.

Defense Prisoner of War Missing Personnel (DPMO)
Provides policy oversight for the mission to recover captured, missing, or isolated personnel, usually military.

Workers Compensation for Overseas Workers

Information on the survivors benefits, including eligibility, etc. Benefits are administered by the Department of Labor.

Longshore and Harbor Workers Compensation Act (LHWCA)
LHWCA forms the basis for workers compensation for overseas workers.

Defense Base Act (DBA) also known as 42 USC § 1651
Defense Base Act extends LHWCA protections to overseas workers employed under contract to US government agencies. Benefits are payable if a casualty is not the result of hostile force(s). 

Workers Compensation Clauses for Overseas Performance (PDF)
Article on the application of FAR 52.228-3 and FAR 52.228-4 contract clauses.

War Hazards Compensation Act (WHCA) also known as 42 USC § 1701
Coverage under WHCA is automatically extended to anyone who has DBA. Benefits are payable if a casualty is the result of hostile force(s).

Regulations under WHCA - Employees Benefits
Title 20 Part 61- Claims for Compensation under the War Hazards Compensation Act, as Amended

Federal Employee Compensation Act (FECA)
WHCA benefits are paid directly from the FECA fund

Regulations under FECA
Title 20 Part 10 - Claims for Compensation under the Federal Employees' Compensation Act, as Amended

Dept of Labor DBA LHWCA page

Dept of Labor Compliance Page - FECA WHCA

Reports, Policies, and Manuals


General information and resources.

From the US Department of State:

Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM)

3 FAM 4100 Foreign Affairs Manual
US State Department Employee Responsibility and Conduct
Including 'Guidelines for Personnel Taken Hostage'

7 FAM 000 Foreign Affairs Manual
Consular Protection of US Nationals Abroad

From the US Department of Defense:

Defense Contingency Contracting Handbook

DA PAM 715–16
Contractor Deployment Guide. Procedures for contractor operations within the Department of the Army. Chapters 10 & 11 cover a variety of issues for hostages, including identification, aid, rights, etc. Department of the Army, February 27, 1998

AR 715-9
Contractors Accompanying the Force, November 29, 1999

Field Manual FM 3-100.21 (formerly FM 100-10-2)
Contractors on the Battlefield, Department of the Army, January 3, 2003. General overview of responsibilities includes brief passages and references on Personnel Recovery, Next of Kin Notification, etc.

Army Publishing Directorate
Everything you ever wanted to read in PDF format from the US Army but can't get access to without a password and login. Great way to double check titles and numbers. Also see:
Department of the Army Official Publishing sites
Lists other websites to find publications - alas, some with secure logins

Army Knowledge Online (AKO)
All Departmental Publications and Forms, including distribution-restricted Items

Army Home Page (AHP)
All Unrestricted Departmental Publications and Forms

U.S. Army Publishing Directorate (APD)
Administrative Departmental Publications and Forms (ARs, CIRs, PAMs, OFs, SFs, DD and DA Forms)

U.S. Army Materiel Command (AMC) Logistics Support Activity
Technical and Equipment Publications(TMs, TBs and SCs)

U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command
Training and Doctrinal Publications (FMs, PBs, TCs and STPs)

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Training & Doctrinal, Technical & Equipment Publications with Engineering & Design Criteria (TMs and FMs)

The Surgeon General/Medical Command
Training & Doctrinal, Technical & Equipment Publications with Medical Content (TMs, FMs, and SB 8-75 Series Publications)

Department of Defense Forms
Just what it sounds like. Standard forms galore. See DD Form 1833 Isolated Personnel Report (ISOPREP)
Standard Forms and Casualty Reporting

Everything starts with a standardized form for information.

SIGACT
Significant Activity reports are typically the very first incident report generated in the field.

SPOT
Synchronized Predeployment and Operational Tracker (SPOT). Registration for contractors working overseas.

DCIPS
Defense Casualty Information Processing System. Electronic reporting system used to report and track casualties.

AF CARES
Armed Forces Casualty Assistance Readiness Enhancement System, March 2007. Electronic system for tracking the progress of a casualty through the system. General order of flow: Initial Contact - Initial Visit - Interment - Disposition of Benefits - Disposition of Personal Effects - Disposition of Investigative Reports - Case After Action Report

Form DS-2060
Report of the Death of an American Citizen Abroad

Casualty Matters

AI Part 52.2 01  (DOC)
Basic form to provide to the Contracting Officer for reporting a hostage. See Part 52, page 31, Hostage Reporting instruction, Joint Contracting Command,  May 2007

AR 15-6 (PDF)
Commanders responsibilities in initiating an investigation of a casualty. Procedures for Investigating Officers and Boards of Officers, Department of the Army, October 2, 2006

AR 600-8-1 Army Casualty Program
Chapter 13 - Procedures for Casualties Involving Missing Persons (Non-Hostile and Hostile)

FM-27-1
Legal Guide for Commanders including authority for an AR-15 investigation

DODI 1300.18 Casualty Matters, Policies
Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures

DODD 1300.22
Mortuary Affairs, November 21, 2003 Disposition of remains, personal effects, etc.

DODD 2310.2
General policy for Personnel Recovery, Department of Defense, December 22, 2000

DODI 2310.4
Repatriation of Prisoners of War, Hostages, Peacetime Government Detainees and Other Missing or Isolated Personnel

DODI 2310.05 Missing Persons
Accounting for Missing Persons – Boards of Inquiry, Department of Defense, March 14, 2008

DODI 3001.03
Responsibility for disposition of human remains. Accounting for Personnel Lost in Past Conflicts – The Armed Forces Identification Review Board (AFIRB), March 14, 2008

Annual Reports of Missing Persons

Military Casualty and Loss

DOS Country Reports on Terrorism
Annual reports on terrorism incidents (includes kidnappings) of American citizens, listed by year since 2000. Country Reports on Terrorism, US Department of State

NCTC Reports on Terrorism
Annual reports of incidents. National Counterterrorism Center

WITS
Searchable database of worlwide terrorism incidents. Search kidnapping. Worldwide Incidents Tracking System, National Counterterrorism Center

Abbreviations

AI Acquisition Instruction 
AR Army Regulation
DODI Department of Defense Instruction
DODD Department of Defense Directive
FAM Foreign Affairs Manual (State Department)
FM Field Manual

Sunday, August 08, 2010

Data on Kidnappings from the State Department

Updated links and information on March 4, 2012

Continuing to try and find as much information as possible for the status table of Americans Missing in Iraq.


Current bedside reading are the annual Department of State Country Reports on Terrorism. The National Counterterrorism Center typically provides statistical data for the annual reports. It appears that the earliest publicly available data set published on kidnappings of U.S. citizens is 2005.

Bookmarking this index for future reference:
U.S. Department of State
Country Reports on Terrorism
The most recent Country Reports on Terrorism for 2010 from the Department of State was issued on August 18. There were no reported kidnappings in 2010 - which is surprising because defense contractor Issa T. Salomi was kidnapped on January 23, 2010 and then later released.

Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, Kidnappings of Private U.S. Citizens, 2010
Country Reports on Terrorism 2010
US Department of State
August 18, 2011
TERRORISM KIDNAPPINGS OF PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS IN 2009



Country Reports on Terrorism 2009
US Department of State
August 5, 2010

CountryDate of KidnappingNumberLocation / Date Released or Rescued
ColumbiaFebruary 6, 20091Cali, Colombia – April 2009
ColumbiaMay 25, 20091Bogota, Colombia - May 28, 2009
KenyaJuly 17, 20091Luuq, Somalia – October 3, 2009
PakistanFebruary 2, 20091Quetta, Pakistan – April 4, 2009


TERRORISM KIDNAPPINGS OF PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS IN 2008

So far, I have been unable to locate the US State data for 2008. It's listed in the 2008 Index as being in Chapter 7 of the report, but it's just not there.

The annual NCTC report, The 2008 Report on Terrorism of April 30, 2009, contains a pie chart, Chart 14 - US Citizen Terrorism Kidnappings by Country on page 32. It cites 4 kidnappings in Afghanistan and 1 in Panama. No mention of Iraq.

However, one news report about the abduction of Issa T. Salomi in early 2010 cited a previous kidnapping of an American citizen in the summer of 2008. See Officials confirm kidnapping of U.S. contractor in Iraq By Ernesto Londoño and Leila Fadel, Washington Post, February 6, 2010.
TERRORISM KIDNAPPINGS OF PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS IN 2007

Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, Kidnappings of Private U.S. Citizens
Country Reports on Terrorism 2007

US Department of State
CountryDate of Incident NumberLocation
AfghanistanSeptember 221Kabul
Before November 71Kabul
ChadOctober 11Bardai
IraqJanuary 51Al-Haritha
January 272Sulaymaniyah
February 11Baghdad
March 31Baghdad
April 25 (approx)1Kuwait-Iraq border
May 251Kuwait-Iraq border
August 171Al Amarah
NigeriaJanuary 71Okan Oil Field, Delta State
May 11Okan Oil Field, Delta State
May 94Okan Oil Field, Delta State
TERRORISM KIDNAPPINGS OF PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS IN 2006

Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, Kidnappings of Private U.S. Citizens
Country Reports on Terrorism 2006

US Department of State

CountryDate of DeathNumberLocation
AfghanistanMarch 30, 2006*
1
Near Gresham, Afghanistan
IraqMarch 30, 2006*
1
Baghdad, Iraq
July 9, 2006*
1
Baghdad, Iraq
August 5, 2006*
1
Baghdad, Iraq
November 16, 2006
4
Aswan, Iraq
Israel, Gaza, and the West BankJune 10, 2006*
1
Nobles, the West Bank
August 27, 2006*
1
Gaza City, Gaza
NigeriaJanuary 30, 2006*
1
Offshore the Niger Delta, Nigeria
August 23, 2006*
1
Port Harcourt, Nigeria

*Date rescued/released.

TERRORISM KIDNAPPINGS OF PRIVATE U.S. CITIZENS IN 2005
Terrorism Deaths, Injuries, Kidnappings of Private U.S. Citizens
Country Reports on Terrorism 2005

US Department of State
CountryDate of IncidentNumberLocation
IraqJanuary 12*1Unknown
IraqApril 111Taji
IraqMay 171Unknown
IraqMay 22*1Unknown
IraqAugust 10*1Unknown
IraqSeptember 7*1Mansour
IraqSeptember 271Unknown
IraqNovember 291Baghdad
IraqDecember 21Unknown
IraqDecember 51Baghdad
Israel, Gaza, and the West BankOctober 12*1Khan Younis [Gaza]
*Date rescued/released

Tables used as is from the Department of State.

Statistical information within the report comes from the Worldwide Incidents Tracking System (WITS) of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). WITS is searchable and open to the public.

NCTC issues an annual report. The report "contains details about incidents of violence against civilians and non-combatants (including military personnel and assets outside of war-like settings) from publicly available information."
WITS maintains a detailed database of incidents. Methodology and definitions are explained in its most recent report from April. In fact, the report is worth reading just for its detailed description of just what they consider to be an act of terrorism.
National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC) Report on Terrorism
Office of the Director of National Intelligence
National Counterterrorism Center, Washington, DC
April 30, 2010
A fascinating side note is that the Department of Defense has a very different definition of terrorism, one that apparently is not universally accepted outside of the DOD.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Lawsuit Filed Against US State Department

The families of three private security contractors - Joshua Munns, Jonathon Cote and John Young of Crescent Security Group, kidnapped in Iraq on November 16, 2006 and later beheaded - are suing the US State Department.

State Department sued in death of Anderson man, other contractors in Iraq
By Ryan Sabalow, The Record Searchlight, March 25, 2010
PDF of the suit accompanying the article Munns et al v. Clinton et al

Mark Munns of Anderson said in an interview Wednesday that the suit was filed in hopes of learning what U.S. officials know about the abduction and what steps they took to find his son, Joshua Munns, and the other men abducted with him. [...]

The suit demands the State Department pay the families their children's life insurance benefits because the contractors were working by proxy for the government at the time.

Crescent Security, the firm for which Munns and the other contractors worked, hasn't paid any death benefits owed to the contractors' surviving family members, the suit says.

The State Department also has been uncooperative in trying to help the family recover the money, the suit alleges.
Be sure to read the PDF of the actual court filing that accompanies the original article.

Looking over the suit, at the very least, it certainly sounds like Crescent Security held 'dead peasant' life insurance policies for its employees.

But what about injury and/or detention? If the Crescent Security insurance policy included Kidnap & Ransom (K&R), what kind of access did the insurance carrier provide to a hostage negotiator? If the company didn't carry injury and/or detention, then the families should qualify for benefits under the Defense Base Act regardless of whether or not Crescent Security carried DBA coverage.

Assuming precedent was set, William Palmer, Munns' attorney, may not be aware of a recent ruling from the Department of Labor in the case of Kirk von Ackermann who disappeared in Iraq on October 9, 2003.

An investigation by the Department of Defense determined von Ackermann was killed during a botched kidnapping by hostile forces. But because Kirk von Ackermann's employer failed to secure DBA insurance, there were substantial delays in awarding the survivor benefits due under the War Hazards Compensation Act. In late 2009, the Department of Labor finally issued a ruling finding in the von Ackermann family's favor and benefits awarded.

It all comes down to the question of just what kind and how broad was the war-risk hazard coverage Crescent Security carried on its employees.

One last thought on the suit...was Jennifer Foo the Casualty Assistance Officer assigned to the case as per the Missing Persons Act? Was Counsel appointed to represent the abducted men?

I've written about this before but just to recap: as American civilian contractors working in support of US operations in Iraq, the abducted employees should have been covered under legislation commonly known as the Missing Persons Act. Family should have received notification that counsel was appointed to represent the abducted men's interests within 45 days of detention. By Day 100, an unclassified summary report should have been provided to the men's family. At the one year anniversary, Day 365, they should have received notification of the meeting of a Board of Inquiry. If that board reached no definitive conclusion as to their whereabouts, additional inquiries should have been held which the family would have had the right to attend. Family could have passed concerns to the counsel as well as provide information and/or objections to any recommendations by the Board of Inquiry.

Additional Reading

The Business of Kidnapping - war-risk hazard premiums and hostage negotiators
February 16, 2010

Book - Big Boy Rules by Steve Fainaru
November 23, 2008

Munns et al v. Clinton et al in filings and dockets at Justia.com
Plaintiffs: Mark Munns, Crista Munns, Dennis Debrabander, Sharon Debrabander and Lori Silveri
Defendants: Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton and Jennifer Foo
Case Number: 2:2010cv00681
Filed: March 22, 2010
Court: California Eastern District Court
Office: Sacramento Office
Presiding Judge: Lawrence K. Karlton
Presiding Judge: Senior Judge Lawrence K. Karlton
Referring Judge: Kimberly J. Mueller
Referring Judge: Magistrate Judge Kimberly J. Mueller
Nature of Suit: Contract - Other Contract
Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Previous related posts

A Sliver of Justice - finding by the Department of Labor in favor of the von Ackermann family
Janaury 10, 2010

Defense Base Act vs War Hazards Compensation Act- non-hostile vs hostile Type of Casualty
December 23, 2008

Iraq Contractors and The Missing Persons Act - legal obligations of the US Government
July 24, 2008

The Defense Base Act/War Hazards Compensation Act Handbook is on sale through Loyola College of Law for $60. Call (504) 861-5441 or Toll Free at (866) 250-8617 to order. For more information, email: clelaw@loyno.edu

Friday, March 05, 2010

Foreign Affairs Manual - hostage and missing

The US Department of State Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) includes sections on hostages and missing persons that I thought were worth including here.

U.S. Department of State

Foreign Affairs Manual

I'm of the opinion that the US government should have a dedicated office for hostage affairs/missing persons of US citizens abroad. It would have a core of permanent staff in addition to representatives from US government agencies such as the FBI, Department of State, Department of Defense (POW-MIA, Casualty Affairs, Criminal Investigation Division, etc). One of the things the office should be responsible for is coordinating regulations and reporting requirements by publishing an annual manual.

Just a thought.

Monday, February 22, 2010

DoD Instruction 1300.18 - update

Wonk stuff.


New language and some new policies added as per 'Change 1' on August 14, 2009 to existing DoD Instruction 1300.18 aka "Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures" (See red text within the instruction for changes/additions/deletions) Enclosure 10 is the one I'm most interested in - 'Procedures for Notifying the Military Service Casualty Offices of Death Investigations.' It appears to be an entirely new addition to 1300.18.

Enclosure 10 is on the last page, page 62. Unfortunately, the language is a bit 'fuzzy' regarding who exactly is covered as 'authorized' 'personnel accompanying' US Armed Forces. For now, let's assume it covers private contractors.

(A note on fuzziness, I do find it fascinating that a bureaucracy as large as the Department of Defense isn't more narrow and specific in their use of language. It's like they don't do a simple cross check of their own terminology. Odd that.

Anyway...

DoD Instruction 1300.18 (PDF)
"Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures"
From the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, January 8, 2008
- replacing DoD Instruction 1300.18, “Military Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures,” December 18, 2000 (hereby canceled)
E10. ENCLOSURE 10

PROCEDURES FOR NOTIFYING THE MILITARY SERVICE CASUALTY OFFICES OF DEATH INVESTIGATIONS

When an investigation into the cause or circumstances surrounding the death of a military member or DoD civilian employee who becomes a fatality while accompanying military personnel in the field or as a result of military-related actions is initiated, the appropriate Military Service Casualty Headquarters Office shall be notified immediately. At a minimum, the Casualty Office shall be provided written confirmation containing:
a. The name of the DoD organization conducting the investigation.
b. The type of investigation being conducted.
c. The existence of any reports by the investigating organization that have been or will be issued as a result of the investigation.
d. A point of contact within the investigating organization that can provide information on the status of the completion of any investigative reports.
e. The procedures for family members to obtain a copy of the completed report(s), to the extent such reports may be furnished consistent with sections 552 and 552a of Reference (h), and to obtain assistance in obtaining a copy of the completed report(s).
f. The procedures for family members to obtain answers to their questions on the completed investigation from a fully qualified representative.
At one point I contacted the Department of Defense to clarify some of the conflicting language within the Instruction and how it relates to the Missing Persons Act (see related posts below). Spoke at some length with a very nice man from Public Affairs who unfortunately, really didn't understand the core policy discrepancies within the Instruction. That wasn't really surprising given the wonkish nature of the subject but what was a shock was to learn there's only one person -- O.N.E. -- in all of Mortuary Affairs who can answer policy questions. Two wars, not to mention smaller conflicts - just one man. Obviously, he's a bit busy. Unfortunately, that also meant too busy to answer any of my questions.

Previous related posts

Defense Base Act vs War Hazards Compensation Act - non-hostile vs hostile Type of Casualty

Casualty Status of Missing - looks at Status and Category of a Casualty in DoD Instruction 1300.18

Iraq Contractors and The Missing Persons Act - outlines legal obligations of the US government

Monday, February 01, 2010

1459 Civilian Contractors Have Died in Iraq

Iraq: Key figures since the war began
By The Associated Press, Washington Post, February 1, 2010

Deaths of civilian employees of U.S. government contractors as of December 31, 2009: 1,459
The article doesn't include information on kidnappings and/or missing Americans.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

Contractor Deployment Guide

I was looking for more background information on general identification requirements for contractors working overseas when I stumbled upon this Pamphlet. Fascinating reading. As far as I can tell, this is the most recent version. It really is a must read for anyone going to work overseas.

Ed. note for June 14, 2010: please use this new link DA PAM 715-16

Contractor Deployment Guide
Pamphlet 715–16
Department of the Army
27 February 1998

DA PAM 715–16
Contractor Deployment Guide

This new Department of the Army pamphlet provides procedures for contractor operations within the Department of the Army.
The Pamphlet includes a short section on Hostages (see page 6), which contains some information that I don't recall reading before.
Chapter 11

11–1. Hostage aid

a. Hostages

When and where the Secretary of State, in consultation with the Secretary of Labor, declares that U.S. citizens or resident aliens of the United States rendering service overseas have been placed in a “captive” status as a result of a “hostile action” against the U.S. government, a wide range of benefits accrue to that person and that
person’s dependents. For example, captives can continue to receive their full pay. Captives can claim some, but not all, of the benefits of the Soldiers’ and Sailors’ Civil Relief Act. A person designated as a captive or his/her family members are eligible for physical and mental health care benefits at U.S. government expense. A spouse
or unmarried dependent of a designated captive is eligible for certain education benefits. If a designated captive ultimately dies from hostile action caused by his/her relationship to the U.S. government, the Secretary of State may provide death benefits to the captive’s survivors.

b. Any person possibly affected (e.g., family members and dependents) may petition the Secretary of State to make the declaration of coverage. Pursuing benefits and remedies under these laws is up to the contractor employee and/or the employee’s family members, dependents or employer.
As far as identification...no surprises. Seems basic. But what exists on paper and what's done in reality are two different things. So, the question that really needs answering is: what identification were Ultra Services personnel expected to carry back in Iraq in 2003?

Identification mentioned in the Contractor Deployment Guide:
Passport
Visas - as needed
Invitational Travel Orders
Uniformed Services Identifications and Privilege Card (DD Form 1173)
Geneva Conventions Identity Card (DD Form 489)
Personal Identification ('dog tags')
Local In-theater Identification (Baghdad International Airport, etc)
Authorization to carry a weapon (from Theater Commander or State Department)
Record of Emergency Data Card (DD Form 93)
Company Id
Drivers license
Record of Immunizations
Medical information ('medical tags')
Not mentioned:
Common Access Card (DD Form 1172-2)
Looking over the list above, what exactly was the green id card issued to Kirk von Ackermann featured in the Rolling Stone article? Was it still valid? And what happened to all of the other identification he should have been carrying?

Always questions.

Related

Base Access
March 20, 2009

Thursday, August 28, 2008

Omar Taleb and Omar Hadi

Two Omars.

This is a look at who they were in relation to those at Ultra Services.

Omar Taleb

Writer Daniel Halpern refers to John Dawkins' body guard in his article for Rolling Stone, Death of a Contractor.

...Omar Taleb, an official in the Iraqi police and a former helicopter pilot in the Iraqi Air Force.
That's pretty much it.

Omar Hadi

Colin Freeman dedicates a chapter of his new book, Curse of the Al Dulaimi Hotel, to the journey into Iraq, appropriately called, The Road to Baghdad. Responding to an ad on a bulletin board at the Intercontinental Hotel in Amman, Jordan, Freeman caught a ride with a British Iraqi named Omar Hadi. Hadi had hired a car and driver to make the trip into Iraq and was taking passengers.

Hadi left Iraq at age 5 and was described as speaking with a public school accent (posh in other words). He was accompanied by John Dawkins whom he was said to have met in Kazakhstan. Hadi was traveling with an elderly aunt and two Japanese filmmakers. The group traveled under the pretense they were working with Tokyo TV - which was how they got Jordanian press cards to enter Iraq.

Hadi stayed at the Al Majalis hotel and visited US bases with Dawkins. Freeman described Hadi as a "business associate" although it's unclear what that really means.

Research

Around April/May 2003, Omar Hadi and Richard Galustian founded ISI Group of Iraq, a security company. From an article first published in the newsletter Gulf State News:
A few local firms have recruited US, British and other former special forces personnel to take on the international players at their own game. ISI Group of Iraq, created by expatriate Iraqis Omar Hadi and Richard Galustian offers former British special forces operatives and says it was the first Iraqi-owned company to be awarded a security contract by the US occupying authorities.
Omar Hadi was listed on various websites as the point of contact for ISI Group. Coincidentally, Richard Galustian was quoted in Death of a Contractor:
[Ryan] Manelick had been in Iraq for less than two months, but he was already plotting to break away from Dawkins and start his own company. He talked less about idealistic notions of helping Iraqis -- now he wanted to make the big money, and he began dreaming up grand, unrealistic schemes. "Ryan had all these plans," says Richard Galustian, a contractor who befriended Manelick in Iraq, "and he could talk about them forever -- he was a wonderful talker. But he had no idea how to make them work, or how far out of his league they were." Manelick wrote to his father about the two of them starting their own security outfit, assuring him that if they acted fast there was a $100 million contract for force protection and security training he was sure they could get. The plans were far removed from reality -- he wanted to build a company from nothing and compete with giant corporations like Bechtel or Halliburton in a matter of months -- but what was real was his intense desire to break away from Dawkins and start something new.
Richard Galustian's father originally owned a company Galustian Engineering Export Company (GEECO) in Tehran before moving to the UK in the 1950's. In 1974, the son was made CEO of his father's group of companies. In 2001, Richard Galustian created Gemini Consultants in the UAE. Galustian was at some point also connected to Pilgrims Group, a "security, risk management and service support company," said to provide security to journalists (ref).

Because of the gap in time between 1974 and 2001, I'm wondering if there were two Richard Galustians, a father and his son.

Additional Reading

Death of a Contractor: Greed and Murder in Iraq's Lawless Desert
pp. 70-74, 76-69 (print version includes photos)
By Dan Halpern, Rolling Stone, March 8, 2007, Issue 1021

Curse of the Al Dulaimi Hotel: And Other Half-truths from Baghdad
By Colin Freeman, Monday Books, July 2008

Profits questions and consolidation for private security firms lifted by the ‘Baghdad bubble’
By Gulf State News, reprinted at NGO Coordination Committee in Iraq (NCCI), November 23, 2005

In Iraq, private contractors lighten load on U.S. troops
By Borzou Daragahi, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, September 28, 2003

Security Companies Doing Business in Iraq as of 2004
From the US State Department, archived at Global Security

The website for ISI Group of Iraq at http://www.isiiraq.com can be seen at the Internet Archive
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.isiiraq.com
Commercial Services in Iraq

The ISI Group of Companies is comprised of ISI Commercial Services, ISI Security, ISI Logistics and ISI International. We started operation in Iraq late April 2003. We currently employ over 100 Iraqi staff.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Casualty Status of Missing

This post expands on the topic of casualty status as relates to missing personnel. Right about now, you probably want me to stop quoting Department of Defense Publications. I kinda think this one is important and suggest reading through to the end.

Each casualty is composed of a) Type, b) Status, and c) Category.

DoD Instruction 1300.18 - "Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures"
From the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, January 8, 2008
- replacing DoD Instruction 1300.18, “Military Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures,” December 18, 2000 (hereby canceled)

4 CASUALTY INFORMATION (page 38)

Use the chart below when completing blocks 4a (TYPE), 4b (STATUS), and 4c (CATEGORY). Only these combinations are authorized. Definitions are contained in Enclosure 2. The word Pending can only be used on Initial or Interim reports.
Taken from the Section E.2 Definitions (page 26):

Type
E2.32. Hostile Casualty. A person who is the victim of a terrorist activity or who becomes a casualty "in action." "In action" characterizes the casualty as having been the direct result of hostile action, sustained in combat or relating thereto, or sustained going to or returning from a combat mission provided that the occurrence was directly related to hostile action. Included are persons killed or wounded mistakenly or accidentally by friendly fire directed at a hostile force or what is thought to be a hostile force. However, not to be considered as sustained in action and not to be interpreted as hostile casualties are injuries or death due to the elements, self-inflicted wounds, combat fatigue, and except in unusual cases, wounds or death inflicted by a friendly force while the individual is in an AWOL, deserter, or dropped-from-rolls status or is voluntarily absent without authority from a place of duty.

E2.38. Non-hostile Casualty. A person who becomes a casualty due to circumstances not directly attributable to hostile action or terrorist activity. Casualties due to the elements, self-inflicted wounds, and combat fatigue are non-hostile casualties.

[Again, "Pending" can only be used on Initial or Interim reports and from what I can glean, it pretty much means deceased...]
Status
E2.11 (page 27)

There are six casualty statuses: (1) deceased; (2) duty status – whereabouts unknown (DUSTWUN) for military, or excused absence – whereabouts unknown (EAWUN) for civilians; (3) missing; (4) very seriously ill or injured (VSI); (5) seriously ill or injured (SI); and (6) not seriously ill or injured (NSI). At the DoD Component’s discretion, an additional casualty status of Special Patient (SPECPAT) or Special Category (SPECAT) may be used [both are injury or illness related].

E2.20. Deceased. A casualty status applicable to a person who is either known to have died, determined to have died on the basis of conclusive evidence, or declared to be dead on the basis of a presumptive finding of death. The recovery of remains is not a prerequisite to determining or declaring a person deceased.

E2.26. Duty Status - Whereabouts Unknown (DUSTWUN). A transitory casualty status, applicable only to military personnel, that is used when the responsible commander suspects the member may be a casualty, whose absence is involuntary, but does not feel sufficient evidence currently exists to make a determination of missing or deceased.

E2.28. Excused Absence – Whereabouts Unknown (EAWUN). An administrative status, applicable only to civilian personnel, that is used when the responsible commander suspects the employee may be a casualty, whose absence is involuntary, but does not feel sufficient evidence currently exists to make a determination of missing or deceased.

E2.37. Missing. A casualty status for which the United States Code provides statutory guidance concerning missing members of the Military Services. Excluded are personnel who are in an AWOL, deserter, or dropped-from-rolls status. [see categories below]

E2.54. Very Seriously Ill or Injured (VSI). The casualty status of a person whose illness or injury is such that medical authority declares it more likely than not that death will occur within 72 hours.

E2.50. Seriously Ill or Injured (SI). The casualty status of a person whose illness or injury requires medical attention, and medical authority declares that death is possible, but not likely within 72 hours, and/or the severity is such that it is permanent and life-altering.

E2.39. Not Seriously Ill or Injured (NSI). The casualty status of a person whose illness or injury requires medical attention, may or may not require hospitalization, and medical authority classifies as less severe than SI.

E2.49. Returned to Military Control (RMC). The status of a person whose casualty status of DUSTWUN or missing has been changed due to the person's return or recovery by U.S. military authority.

[Again, "Pending" can only be used on Initial or Interim reports.]

Note

E2.46. Prisoner of War (POW). POW is not a casualty status for reporting purposes. For reporting purposes, the casualty status and category would be missing-captured.
Category

A person declared missing is categorized as follows:
E2.37.1. Beleaguered. The casualty is a member of an organized element that has been surrounded by a hostile force to prevent escape of its members.

E2.37.2. Besieged. The casualty is a member of an organized element that has been surrounded by a hostile force, compelling it to surrender.

E2.37.3. Captured. The casualty has been seized as the result of action of an unfriendly military or paramilitary force in a foreign country. See also Prisoner of War (POW).

E2.37.4. Detained. The casualty is prevented from proceeding or is restrained in custody for alleged violation of international law or other reason claimed by the government or group under which the person is being held.

E2.37.5. Interned. The casualty is definitely known to have been taken into custody of a nonbelligerent foreign power as the result of and for reasons arising out of any armed conflict in which the Armed Forces of the United States are engaged.

E2.37.6. Missing. The casualty is not present at his or her duty location due to apparent involuntary reasons and whose location is unknown.

E2.37.7. Missing in Action (MIA). The casualty is a hostile casualty, other than the victim of a terrorist activity, who is not present at his or her duty location due to apparent involuntary reasons and whose location is unknown.

[Again, "Pending" can only be used on Initial or Interim reports.]
Missing Missing is Missing

If you managed to work your way through the various definitions and read the above carefully, many small details probably started to jump out at you. Keep in mind, the whole point of DoDI 1300.18 is it "provides uniform official casualty terms and definitions."

Mission so not accomplished.

One

There is no written definition for one line shown in the Casualty Information Chart a) Type: Hostile b) Status: Missing and c) Category: Terrorist. In theory, this combination should have been included as a category under definition E2.37.8. But, it's not there. Further along, there is a definition for "Terrorism"...but I'm specifically interested in "Terrorist" as used to categorize Missing Status.
E2.52. Terrorism. The calculated use of unlawful violence or threat of unlawful violence to inculcate fear; intended to coerce or to intimidate governments or societies in the pursuit of goals that are generally political, religious, or ideological.
Two

There is no line in the Casualty Information Chart for a) Type: Hostile b) Status: Missing and c) Category: Missing although this combination is included in the definition E2.37.6.

Missing-Missing (E2.37.6) is quite literally missing from the Casualty Information Chart. Instructions are very clear - "Only these combinations are authorized." With a little help from Photoshop, the corrected chart with the line inserted is shown below:

Three

If "RET MIL CONTROL" or Returned to Military Control is shown under "4b) Status" on the Casualty Information Chart, why isn't it included in the list at E.11 on page 27 which specifically states that there are "six casualty statuses?" Dare I mention, the acronym for Returned to Military Control is RMC not RET MIL CONTROL under "Definition."

Does the chart over rule the definition? Does the definition overrule the chart? Which instruction is correct? And what kind of impact does all of this have on casualty reporting?

More...

There's also an issue with the Casualty Feeder Card (DA Form 1156) used by Commanders that I referenced in another post just the other day, Iraq, Contractors and The Missing Persons Act. The options for "Status" on DA Form 1156 do not match those in the definitions or in the Casualty Information Chart of DoDI 1300.18. Statuses shown on the DA Form 1156 are: (1) deceased; (2) DUSTWUN (3) VSI (4) SI (5) NSI and (6) Pending. No "Missing." And as there is no "Missing," I'm also wondering why DUSTWUN isn't at least listed as DUST/EA-WUN since the form applies to both military and civilian personnel.

I'd love to drop an email to the Office of the Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness to point out the conflicts between chart and definitions. But, they don't have any contact information on their website. So, I'm off to fill out the generic contact form at DefenseLink.

Maybe I should just type up a new Excel Table for the DoD.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Iraq Contractors and The Missing Persons Act

Editor's note: the following is based on information available at the time of writing in 2008 and may not accurately reflect procedures and policies in place in the fall of 2003.

As an American civilian contractor working in support of US Army operations in Iraq, Kirk von Ackermann should have been covered under legislation commonly known as the Missing Persons Act. His family should have received notification that counsel was appointed to represent his interests within 45 days of his disappearance. By Day 100, an unclassified summary report should have been provided to von Ackermann's family. At the one year anniversary, Day 365, they should have received notification of the meeting of a Board of Inquiry. If that board reached no definitive conclusion as to his whereabouts, additional inquiries should have been held which the family would have had the right to attend. The von Ackermann family could have passed concerns to the counsel as well as provide information and/or objections to any recommendations by the Board of Inquiry.

But, that's not what happened....something went awry after the Battalion Commander in Tikrit first reported von Ackermann missing.

This post and the following chart are an attempt to recreate the flow of reports and information in 2003 and 2004.


The Missing Persons Act

The Missing Persons Act was first established in 1942, the same year as the Defense Base Act. At the time, the primary purpose of the legislation was to alleviate financial hardship suffered by the dependents of servicemen reported as missing [ref]. Over the years, The Missing Persons Act has been amended.

§ 1501. System for accounting for missing persons

(1) The Secretary of Defense shall establish within the Office of the Secretary of Defense an office to have responsibility for Department of Defense policy relating to missing persons. Subject to the authority, direction, and control of the Secretary of Defense, the responsibilities of the office shall include­­
(A) policy, control, and oversight within the Department of Defense of the entire process for investigation and recovery related to missing persons (including matters related to search, rescue, escape, and evasion); and

(B) coordination for the Department of Defense with other departments and agencies of the United States on all matters concerning missing persons.
In 1996, a new provision was added allowing the Department of Defense to designate a missing person as deceased without proof. In addition, the new changes allow government agencies to withhold information on missing persons without penalty. [ref] The 1996 amendments were controversial with some veterans groups who, unsuccessfully, attempted to have them removed.

Reporting

The status of 'missing,' both hostile and non-hostile, is considered a casualty. The Army Casualty Program publication Army Regulation (AR) 600-8-1 outlines the general steps and time frame for reporting procedures for missing persons.
AR 600-8-1
Chapter 13
Procedures for Casualties Involving Missing Persons (Non-Hostile and Hostile)
May 15, 2007
Casualty Assistance

Casualty Assistance Centers (CACs) noted in the above chart "... accomplish the administrative functions of the casualty operations, mortuary affairs, and line of duty programs, the key subcomponents of the Army Casualty Program. They account for, report, and document all casualties. The Casualty and Memorial Affairs Operations Center (CMAOC), U.S. Army Human Resources Command (AHRC-PEZ), has technical supervision over CACs worldwide. "

A general overview of procedural responsibility of CAC's can be found at the DoD Instruction 1300.18 - "Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures" - which describes the responsibilities of the Casualty Assistance Officer.

6.1.4. Casualty Assistance

6.1.4.1. DUSTWUN, EAWUN, Missing, or Deceased Cases. In all cases involving DUSTWUN, EAWUN, missing, or deceased casualties, the DoD Component concerned shall appoint a casualty assistance officer who will initiate contact with the [primary next of kin] PNOK within 24 hours following initial notification. Within the guidelines established by each DoD Component, the casualty assistance officer may be the notification officer. The casualty assistance officer, to the extent the PNOK desires, shall provide guidance and assistance for such matters as pay, allowances and benefits, veteran benefits, social security benefits, and income tax refunds or exclusions whenever section 692 of title 26, U.S.C. (Reference (r)) applies to the particular case. Assistance to civilian personnel will be coordinated through the designated civilian personnel office or civilian benefits center. The casualty assistance officer shall provide points of contact or information regarding autopsy reports, all known reports of inquiry or investigations, as applicable, and other governmental or non-DoD agencies that may be involved in a particular case. The casualty assistance officer shall maintain contact with the PNOK to keep them informed until all matters relating to the case have been answered and all entitlements and benefits are received.
I admit to being confused here. The commander, who in theory first reported von Ackermann as missing, was in the US Army. The DoD Component within which Iraq falls, Central Command (CENTCOM), reports civilian casualties to a Designated Military Service, in this case, the US Air Force, at HQ Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC/DPFCS) at Randolph AFB in Texas.
E6.2.1.1. Casualty reports will be submitted without delay to the appropriate Military Service Headquarters Casualty Office within 24 hours of a Component learning of the casualty.
The following sample report, "DoD Component Civilian Casualty Report," referred to as "Enclosure 6," is used to input data into the Defense Casualty Information Processing System (DCIPS) which, in theory, maintains data on all casualties including civilian contractors.

From this Casualty Report, DCIPS will generate DD Form 1300, "Report of Casualty."

Commander's Report - DD Form 2812

In order to complete the above steps, an initial report of a missing person, DD Form 2812, is prepared within the first 10 days by the appropriate commander. The commander also completes a short casualty checklist known as a "casualty feeder card" (DA Form 1156).



§ 1502. Missing persons: initial report

(a) Preliminary assessment and recommendation by commander.-- After receiving information that the whereabouts and status of a person described in section 1501(c) of this title is uncertain and that the absence of the person may be involuntary, the commander of the unit, facility, or area to or in which the person is assigned shall make a preliminary assessment of the circumstances. If, as a result of that assessment, the commander concludes that the person is missing, the commander shall­­
(1) recommend that the person be placed in a missing status; and

(2) not later than 10 days after receiving such information, transmit a report containing that recommendation to the Secretary concerned in accordance with procedures prescribed under section 1501(b) of this title.
(b) Transmission of advisory copy to theater component commander.-- When transmitting a report under subsection (a)(2) recommending that a person be placed in a missing status, the commander transmitting that report shall transmit an advisory copy of the report to the theater component commander with jurisdiction over the missing person.

(c) Safeguarding and forwarding of records.-- A commander making a preliminary assessment under subsection (a) with respect to a missing person shall (in accordance with procedures prescribed under section 1501 of this title) safeguard and forward for official use any information relating to the whereabouts and status of the missing person that results from the preliminary assessment or from actions taken to locate the person.

When Safa Shukir called John Dawkins to tell him he had found Kirk von Ackermann's vehicle abandoned on an isolated road, Shukir had reached Dawkins in the contracting office at a US Army base in Tikrit. The battalion commander at the time was LTC Steven Russell who would have relied on Department of Defense Instruction (DODI) 2310.5 for guidance.

DODI 2310.5 is applicable to both military and civilian personnel and details steps for filing DD Form 2812, "Commander's Preliminary Assessment and Recommendation Regarding Missing Person" sometimes referred to as a Commander's Report.

To create the report, the commander is likely to initiate an informal investigation known as an AR 15-6 investigation. The commander assigns an investigating officer who compiles a preliminary report, DA Form 1574, "Report of Proceedings by Investigating Officer." DA Form 1574 includes a chronology, witness statements, exhibits with an index indicating what evidence there is and where it is stored.
DODI 2310.05 [2310.5]

Accounting for Missing Persons (PDF) - Boards of Inquiry
COMMANDER'S PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATION
Department of Defense, Army Publishing Directorate
January 31, 2000 with administrative changes March 1, 2008
Page 15 - 23

E3.1. PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AND RECOMMENDATION BY COMMANDER

E3.1.1. A flow chart diagramming the elements of the commander's preliminary assessment and recommendation, together with the elements of an initial board of inquiry that would follow that assessment, is found at attachment E3.A1. of this enclosure.



E3.1.2. Information may be received showing that the whereabouts and status of a covered person are uncertain and that the absence of the person may be involuntary. If so, the commander of the unit, facility, or area to or in which the person is assigned shall make a preliminary assessment of the circumstances. When the circumstances of the involuntary absence are questionable, i.e., whether the absence resulted from hostile action, the commander of the unit, facility, or area to or in which the person is assigned shall submit a preliminary assessment and recommendation. Attachment E3.A2. of this enclosure contains a checklist of those items, as applicable, that the commander may wish to consider when preparing the assessment. If, as a result of that assessment, the commander concludes that the person is missing, the commander shall:

E3.1.2.1. Recommend that the person be placed in a missing status; and

E3.1.2.2. Transmit a report containing the recommendation to the Secretary concerned in accordance with procedures prescribed by that Secretary not later than 10 days after receiving such information.

E3.1.3. DD Form 2812, "Commander's Preliminary Assessment and Recommendation Regarding Missing Person," is found at attachment E3.A3. of this enclosure.


E3.1.4. Transmission of a DD Form 2812 is not always required. For instance,
evidence regarding a covered person may be received through news coverage or
discovered through diplomatic channels. That evidence may be sufficient to enable the commander to make a preliminary assessment regarding the covered person's whereabouts and status and whether the absence of the person is involuntary. In all cases, however, the evidence upon which this determination is made shall be recorded and preserved. Receipt of additional evidence could require the commander to submit a preliminary assessment and recommendation. Such evidence could include cessation of hostilities without the return of the covered person or a complete lack of further evidence that, without additional information, could create a doubt concerning the whereabouts and status of the covered person. A preliminary assessment and recommendation is required whenever evidence is received or discovered that may cause the whereabouts and status of the covered person to be uncertain and indicates that the absence of the person may be involuntary.

E3.1.5. Persons who are "covered persons" (defined herein at paragraph E2.1.7.) are limited to those whose involuntary absence arises as a result of a hostile action or under circumstances suggesting that the involuntary absence is a result of a hostile action and whose status is undetermined or who is unaccounted for. A case resolution file will be created and maintained on a covered person and an initial board of inquiry will be convened to inquire into the whereabouts and status of the person. The Under Secretary of Defense for Policy shall determine, with regard to a pending or ongoing military operation, the specific employees, or groups of employees, of contractors of the Department of Defense to be considered to be covered persons. In appropriate circumstances, the USD(P) may expand coverage to non-U.S. citizen civilian officers and employees of the Department of Defense.

E3.1.6. The scope of persons for whom the United States will undertake Personnel Recovery is not limited to situations involving hostile action or circumstances suggestive of hostile action. Personnel Recovery measures may be initiated for personnel (U.S., allied, or coalition) who become unaccounted for as a result of training exercises, operations other than war wherein hostile action is not involved and operational environments not involving hostile action. The specific persons for whom Personnel Recovery may be initiated will vary based upon the circumstances unique to each situation. Located at attachment E3.A4. of this enclosure is a graph depicting the relationship of "covered persons" for whom case resolution files and boards of inquiry apply and those to whom Personnel Recovery applies. For further information on Personnel Recovery, refer to DoD Directive 2310.2, "Personnel Recovery" (reference (d)).

E3.2. TRANSMISSION OF ADVISORY COPY TO THEATER COMPONENT COMMANDER

The Commander of the unit, facility, or area to or in which the person is assigned shall, when recommending that a person be placed in a missing status, transmit an advisory copy of the preliminary assessment and recommendation to the theater Component Commander having jurisdiction over the missing person.

E3.2. TRANSMISSION OF ADVISORY COPY TO THEATER COMPONENT COMMANDER

The Commander of the unit, facility, or area to or in which the person is assigned shall, when recommending that a person be placed in a missing status, transmit an advisory copy of the preliminary assessment and recommendation to the theater Component Commander having jurisdiction over the missing person.

E3.3. SAFEGUARDING AND FORWARDING OF RECORDS

In accordance with procedures prescribed by the Secretary concerned, a Commander
making a preliminary assessment and recommendation with respect to a missing person shall:

E3.3.1. Safeguard and forward, to the Secretary concerned for official use, any
information relating to the whereabouts and status of the missing person that results from the preliminary assessment and recommendation or from actions taken to locate the person.

E3.3.2. Attachment E3.A2. of this enclosure contains a checklist of those items, as
applicable, that the commander may wish to safeguard and forward.
For the most part, E3.A2 relates to recordings, vehicles, weapons and ordinance (think plane crash as a result of missile fire). It does not list personal effects.

Once the Commander's Assessment and Recommendation is filed with The Adjutant General and Theater Component Commander, usually within 10 days of the initial incident, and as authority passes to a Board of Inquiry, jurisdiction over any future investigation becomes unclear. Which may explain why an aggressive and formal investigation into the disappearance of Kirk von Ackermann, once properly accounted for as a missing person, was seemingly forgotten. That is, until his colleague Ryan Manelick was murdered shortly after alleging fraud at Ultra Services.

So, what happened?

Was there a Board of Inquiry? Is Kirk von Ackermann listed in the DCIPS? Was a Casualty Assistance Officer assigned to his case? Did the Missing Persons Act fail to protect the legal rights of Kirk von Ackermann as a missing person and if so, what steps need to be taken to prevent that from ever happening again? At what point did the system break down?

Changes Since 2003

In the summer of 2004, the US Department of State Hostage Working Group was organized by the US Embassy in Baghdad to monitor hostages in Iraq. The Group is sometimes referred to as the Office of Hostage Affairs. According to news reports, the group meets weekly bringing together officials from the FBI, the Defense Department, the State Department and the Iraqi government.

Between January 2006 and January 2007, a Hostage Reporting contract clause was added to Joint Contracting Command (JCC) Acquisition Instructions. The clause is intended for construction and service contracts, and does not address the gray area of service incidental to supply of supply contracts. Contracting officers are now responsible for gathering the very first details of an incident and submitting the information to JCC.
See: Acquisition Instruction (AI), Part 52.2, 01 May 2007

Additional Reading

Army Publishing Directorate - regulations and so much more including a complete list of Department of Defense Issuances (DODI)

DoD Instruction 1300.18 - Personnel Casualty Matters, Policies, and Procedures from the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness from January 8, 2008

DoD Directive 1300.22 - from the Joint Mortuary Affairs Office, Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness, on Personal Effects from February 3, 2000 current as of November 21, 2003

Defense Prisoner of War/Missing Personnel Office (DPMO) responsibility for Personnel Recovery after the conclusion of hostilities
Try this link: http://www.dtic.mil/dpmo/faq/

Military Assistance Program includes information from Mortuary and Casualty Affairs

General Information

Casualty: There are six casualty statuses: (1) deceased; (2) duty status – whereabouts unknown (DUSTWUN) for military, or excused absence – whereabouts unknown (EAWUN) for civilians; (3) missing; (4) very seriously ill or injured (VSI); (5) seriously ill or injured (SI); and (6) not seriously ill or injured (NSI). At the DoD Component’s discretion, an additional casualty status of Special Patient (SPECPAT) or Special Category (SPECAT) may be used. POW is not a casualty status for reporting purposes, rather status and category are "missing-captured."

Civilian: A person who is not a member of the armed forces, including a member of the general public, U.S. and non-U.S., a defense contractor, a DoD civilian employee, non-DoD Federal employees, or military dependents.

Contractor: An individual or employee of a private business who contracts to furnish supplies [supply] or perform work [construction or service] at a certain price or rate.

Defense Casualty Information Processing System (DCIPS): The system of record for the "Report of Casualty" DD Form 1300 and other documents and reports. The DCIPS Configuration Control Board (CCB) governs changes within this system. DCIPS is an electronic system used in the collection and management of casualty data and produces the DD Form 1300 and other documents and reports.